Nivolumab cuts relapse by one third compared to Ipilimumab

The immunotherapy drug nivolumab is safer and more effective than ipilimumab—the current standard of care—in treating patients with resected stage III and stage IV melanoma, according to an international clinical trial

The study compared the two drugs in 906 patients with stage IIIb, IIIc, and IV melanoma. All participants had the disease surgically removed prior to receiving immunotherapy, making this study one of the first to investigate these very high-risk patients in a head-to-head trial.

The study involved two groups of 453 participants–one treated with nivolumab and the other treated with ipilimumab. 

After 12 months of continuous therapy, 71% of patients treated with nivolumab lived without recurrence of the disease, compared with 61% of those treated with ipilimumab. At 18 months, the relapse-free survival rate for nivolumab was 66 percent, while it was only 53 percent for ipilimumab. This international trial was conducted at 130 medical centres across 25 different countries.

“Our results demonstrate that nivolumab is more effective in treating patients with stage III and IV melanoma, cutting the risk of relapse by a third,” said Principal investigator Dr Jeffrey S. Weber, Professor of medicine at NYU School of Medicine and deputy director of Perlmutter Cancer Center. “Results like this will change how we practice medicine. Hopefully, physicians will embrace the use of nivolumab in these high-risk patients as adjuvant therapy.”

Nivolumab, publicly marketed as Opdivo, also was more tolerable for patients than ipilimumab. Only 14 percent of patients treated with nivolumab experienced severe side effects while 45 percent of patients experienced them with ipilimumab.

Some patients had to discontinue treatment due to the severity—but only five percent of those on nivolumab, as opposed to 31 percent of those on ipilimumab. The most common side effects of both therapies were fatigue and diarrhoea.

“Our results demonstrate that nivolumab is more effective in treating patients with stage III and IV melanoma, cutting the risk of relapse by a third,” said Dr Weber. “Results like this will change how we practice medicine. Hopefully, physicians will embrace the use of nivolumab in these high-risk patients as adjuvant therapy.”

Nivolumab, publicly marketed as Opdivo, also was more tolerable for patients than ipilimumab. Only 14 percent of patients treated with nivolumab experienced severe side effects while 45 percent of patients experienced them with ipilimumab. Some patients had to discontinue treatment due to the severity—but only five percent of those on nivolumab, as opposed to 31 percent of those on ipilimumab. The most common side effects of both therapies were fatigue and diarrhoea.

Metastatic melanoma accounts for approximately one percent of skin cancer cases, but, at the same time, causes the majority of skin cancer deaths. Nivolumab and ipilimumab are already FDA-approved in the treatment of metastatic melanoma; for some patients, the two drugs have been used in combination.

Dr Weber has said that he hopes to lead further research that looks at categorising tumours that occur in relapsed patients and studying whether or not they would benefit from another resection and more nivolumab. He also says that more studies are needed to examine why some patients relapse following treatment and others do not.

Bristol Meyers Squibb, the manufacturer of both nivolumab and ipilimumab, funded this clinical trial and provided Dr Weber and his colleagues with research support.